| |
 |
|
| Click the photo to see more images of the Olympus E-520. |
Camera Test: Olympus E-3
262010
Olympus
E-3
First impressions matter, especially for photographers seeking a picture-taking partner. But sometimes it takes a real effort to figure out if a DSLR is the perfect match for you. For instance, when Olympus introduced us to its new 10.1MP E-3 ($1,700, street, body only), it seemed like love at first sight (see Hands On, December 2007). Yet we needed time (and Lab tests of a production model...how romantic!) to confirm our first impressions. Are we still enamoured? Even more so. This new Olympus flagship DSLR proves that the Four Thirds system has a bona fide place in the pro and advanced-amateur photographer's kit. Continuing the innovation begun with the E-1, its predecessor, the E-3 incorporates such features as the Supersonic Wave Filter dust reduction system, as well as staples of its sub-$1,000 DSLR line, such as live view with autofocus and sensor-based image stabilization with live confirmation. Olympus replaced the E-1's sluggish AF with a super-fast, 11-point biaxial AF system. It improved the viewfinder, burst rate, and durability of the body and shutter. Plus, it threw in a swiveling 2.5-inch LCD and pop-up flash with wireless external flash control. Performance? The E-3 did incredibly well in the Pop Photo Lab's image quality tests, challenging (though not outperforming) the 12.3MP Nikon D300 ($1,800, body only), tested in this issue. It earned a similar Excellent image quality rating all the way up to ISO 3200 when shooting in RAW mode.
Jaded? Amid all the
new DSLRs and jaw-dropping
technology, it's easy to feel ho-hum
about an Excellent image-quality
rating from the Pop Photo Lab, topshelf
image stabilization, live view,
and a price so friendly it damn near
invites you over for drinks. That's
certainly the case with the 10MP
Olympus E-520. Especially at $550,
street, body only; $630 with 14-
42mm f/3.5-5.6 Zuiko Digital lens.
Yes, it's easy to dismiss it as a
mere upgrade of last year's E-510,
but it offers much more than just a
bigger LCD (2.7-inch vs. 2.5) and
a faster processor (for a burst rate
of 3.5 frames per second vs. 3).
It's also easy to wave it on as the
fifth-place finisher in our August
"Midlevel Marvels" DSLR shootout,
but that doesn't do this camera
justice, either. Up against the
Canon EOS Rebel XSi, Nikon D60,
Pentax K200D, and Sony Alpha
350, the Olympus didn't score high
in terms of a system (lots of lenses
and accessories) or easy control
of the settings. But all is not lost.
Especially for those who want to join
the Four Thirds system and don't
expect to buy pro-caliber arsenals
of add-ons in the near future -- and who don't share our views of menudriven
camera controls.
In the shootout, there was space
only to summarize our findings
from both the Lab and field tests.
Here's a deeper look.
|
WHAT'S HOT
• Excellent imaging at
every ISO.
• Live view mode previews
your settings.
• Very effective IS.
• It dives-with the PT-E05
($830, street) body case.
WHAT'S NOT
• Not-so-sensitive AF.
• Clunky RAW-to-
JPEG editing.
• Menus can seem like
a maze.
• Settings could use
streamlining.
WHO'S THIS FOR?
• Four Thirds system
enthusiasts who are looking
for a full-featured, solid performing
camera at a
super price.
• First-time DSLR buyers who
are looking for the same.
|
Sharp shooting
Image quality? Impressive. The
E-520 showed great consistency,
both across the ISO range and in
RAW and JPEG capture. It's one thing to garner Excellent imaging scores at
ISO 100 in a huge TIFF made from a RAW
file, and another in a JPEG at ISO 1600 --
exactly what the E-520 did. With Medium
noise reduction on at ISO 1600, it scored
Low on noise while resolving just under
1900 lines. With no NR applied, noise
moved up slightly to Moderately Low
and resolution reached 1930 lines. Color
accuracy at ISO 1600 nosed into Excellent
with an average Delta E of 7.85.
This tied it for third in image quality in
August's shootout. With the five cameras
averaging better than 2,000 lines of
resolution, though, middle of the pack
here would have been top of the heap
not long ago. And there's no slamdunk
champ in this category. The
12.2MP Canon EOS Rebel XSi
topped the E-520 in resolution,
but was slightly behind in noise
performance. The Nikon D60
had superior noise numbers
but a near-insignificant edge
in resolution. And we judge
the E-520's imaging superior
to that of the 14.2MP Sony
Alpha 350, whose noise was
such that images at higher ISOs
lost significant resolution when
cleaned up with noise reduction.
No weighting
The solid feel of the E-520 is belied by its weight -- 1.7 pounds with the kit lens, among the lightest in its class. And, unlike its stablemate the E-420, which some bigger-handed photographers find too petite, the E-520 feels good in hands large and small.
The shutter button, thumb rest,
command dial, and exposure comp button
are in just the right places. We wish there
were a second command dial, but that's
the impossible dream in this class.
The pentamirror viewfinder has 0.91X
magnification, just earning an Excellent
rank, but it still has a tunnel-vision effect.
This is partly perceptual -- the squarer
4:3 aspect ratio of the Four Thirds frame
seems smaller than the wider-screen
3:4 rectangle of APS-C and full-frame
cameras. Eyeglass-wearers may have to
shift to see the readouts next to the image.
Every control can be reached through
the menus. One layer up, the LCD serves
as a status and control panel; press the
OK button to scroll around the panel
with the command dial or four-way
controller, then adjust settings. The
control panel is reasonably quick in
use and gives you an extensive (if
crowded) view of key settings. One
layer further up, a dozen buttons
are dedicated to specific settings,
and you can assign a function
button to any control. Again,
pretty quick in use.
But the dedicated buttons
bring up submenus you have to
scroll through -- fine for things like
ISO and white balance, but irksome when switching from auto to manual
focus. That takes a button press, two
clicks of the dial or controller, and another
press of a button or the shutter release.
So the AF/MF switch can't be done at
eye-level, as on most DSLRs. To set "onetouch"
custom WB, you assign it to the
function button -- a scroll through three
menu screens. These controls could be
less cumbersome and more logical.
|